Ranking from Pairwise Comparisons: The Role of the Pairwise Preference Matrix

نویسنده

  • Arun Rajkumar
چکیده

Ranking a set of items given preferences among them is a fundamental problem that arises naturally in several real world situations such as ranking candidates in elections, movies, sports teams, documents in response to a query to name a few. In each of these situations, the preference data among the items to be ranked may be available in different forms: as pairwise comparisons, partial orderings or complete orderings. Ranking from pairwise comparison data is especially attractive in large scale settings (such as movie ranking) where the number of items to be ranked is large and it is impractical to obtain partial or complete rankings over the items. Moreover studies in the cognitive psychology literature confirm that it is easy for humans to give preferences among items by comparing them in pairs as opposed to giving complete orderings over a set of items. While several algorithms (both classical and recent) have been proposed for the problem of ranking from pairwise comparisons in multiple communities such as machine learning, operations research, linear algebra, statistics [23, 13, 12, 18], it is not well understood under what conditions these different algorithms perform well. In this thesis, we aim to fill this fundamental gap in understanding by studying the properties of different algorithms for ranking from pairwise comparisons and proposing new algorithms which have better statistical guarantees than previous algorithms. Towards this, we will consider a natural framework to study this problem wherein for every pair of items (i, j), there is a coin with bias pij that is flipped to decide the outcome whenever items i and j are compared. The matrix P containing all these numbers pij is called the pairwise preference matrix and has been used either implicitly or explicitly in much previous work in this area [2, 18, 24]. In this thesis, will elucidate the crucial role played by this matrix in determining the performance of various existing algorithms under different settings and in developing new algorithms with improved statistical guarantees.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

When can we rank well from comparisons of \(O(n\log(n))\) non-actively chosen pairs?

Ranking from pairwise comparisons is a ubiquitous problem and has been studied in disciplines ranging from statistics to operations research and from theoretical computer science to machine learning. Here we consider a general setting where outcomes of pairwise comparisons between items i and j are drawn probabilistically by flipping a coin with unknown bias Pij , and ask under what conditions ...

متن کامل

Preference Completion: Large-scale Collaborative Ranking from Pairwise Comparisons

In this paper we consider the collaborative ranking setting: a pool of users each provides a small number of pairwise preferences between d possible items; from these we need to predict each users preferences for items they have not yet seen. We do so by fitting a rank r score matrix to the pairwise data, and provide two main contributions: (a) we show that an algorithm based on convex optimiza...

متن کامل

Inductive Pairwise Ranking: Going Beyond the n log(n) Barrier

We study the problem of ranking a set of items from nonactively chosen pairwise preferences where each item has feature information with it. We propose and characterize a very broad class of preference matrices giving rise to the Feature Low Rank (FLR) model, which subsumes several models ranging from the classic Bradley–Terry–Luce (BTL) (Bradley and Terry 1952) and Thurstone (Thurstone 1927) m...

متن کامل

Determination of weight vector by using a pairwise comparison matrix based on DEA and Shannon entropy

The relation between the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a topic of interest to researchers in this branch of applied mathematics. In this paper, we propose a linear programming model that generates a weight (priority) vector from a pairwise comparison matrix. In this method, which is referred to as the E-DEAHP method, we consider each row of the pairwise...

متن کامل

The separation, and separation-deviation methodology for group decision making and aggregate Ranking

In a generic group decision scenario, the decision makers review alternatives and then provide their own individual ranking. The aggregate ranking problem is to obtain a ranking that is fair and representative of the individual rankings. We argue here that using cardinal pairwise comparisons provides several advantages over score-wise models. The aggregate group ranking problem is then formaliz...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2015